Investigation the Accuracy of Static Analysis Method in Comparison with Spectral Dynamic and Time History Analyses in Steel Structures with Mass Irregularity

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Eyvanekey, Semnan, Iran

2 MSc, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Eyvanekey, Semnan, Iran

3 Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

There are several methods for structural analysis and design, one of which is equivalent to static analysis. There are limitations. 4 models are examined in this research, the general shape of the plan of a five-story frame, in the first sample is a regular frame, the second sample is a mass irregularity in the first floor, the third sample is a mass irregularity in the third floor and the fourth sample is a mass irregularity in the fifth floor and Its seismic loading has been studied using the standard design spectrum of 2800 fourth edition. Mass irregularities in the first floor with a difference of 45% were higher than other classes and mass irregularities in the third floor were 15% less than the regular sample. Dynamic time history analysis was performed using different near and far fault earthquakes. Responses of lateral and relative displacement were calculated for different stories and compared with the allowable values of the regulations. As a deductive result of this study, we can point to the conservatism of the equivalent static method in estimating the incision and the inability of this method to consider the shape of the load. The results show a decrease in the seismic capacity of structures with mass irregularities in height and therefore it is recommended to avoid creating mass irregularities in height as much as possible.

Keywords


[1]- Standard No. 2800, 2005, Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings. Third Revision, Building & Housing Research Center, Iran.
[2]- Park, Y. J., Ang., A. and Wen, Y. K., 1984, Seismic Damage Analysis and Damage Limiting Design of Reinforced Concrete Building, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
[3]- Kunnath, S. K., Reinhorn, A. M. and Lobo, R. F., 1992, IDARC 2D Ver.3.0: A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Report No. NCEER-92-0022, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo.
[4]- Papageorgiou, A. S., 1998, The Character of Near Source Ground Motion and Related Seismic Design Issues, Proc. of the Structural Engineers World Congress, San Francisco California, 18-23.
[5]- Kabeyasawa, T., Shiohara, H., Otani, S. and Aoyama, H., 1983, Analysis of the Full-scale Seven–story Reinforced Concrete Test Structure, The Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Vol. XXXVII, No. 2, 432-478.
[6]- انصاری، ح.، قاسمی، ا. ع.، و روحانی منش، م. ص.، ۱۳۹۷، ارزیابی قابلیت اطمینان عملکرد لرزه ای قاب های خمشی ویژه فولادی با درنظر گرفتن نامنظمی در ارتفاع، کنفرانس بین المللی امنیت، پیشرفت و توسعه پایدار مناطق مرزی، سرزمینی و کلانشهرها، راهکارها و چالش ها با محوریت پدافند غیر عامل و مدیریت بحران، تهران، دانشگاه افسری امام علی (ع).
[7]- شهبازی، ا.، صابری، و.، و صابری، ح.، ۱۳۹۶، بررسی دقت روش تحلیل استاتیکی در قیاس با روش دینامیکی طیفی و تاریخچه زمانی در سازه های میان مرتبه فولادی، چهارمین کنفرانس بین المللی معماری و شهرسازی پایدار - دبی و مصدر، دبی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد امارات.
[8]- حسینی مهر، م.، موسوی نژاد، س.، ۱۳۹۷، مقایسه اثرات استفاده از جداگرهای LRB و میراگرهای ADAS در سازه قاب خمشی فولادی ویژه نامنظم جرمی ، تحت اثر مولفه افقی و عمودی زلزله های نزدیک گسل، سومین کنفرانس بین المللی یافته های نوین عمران معماری و صنعت ساختمان ایران، تهران- دانشگاه تهران، دبیرخانه دائمی کنفرانس.
[9]- امیری, م.، یخچالیان، م.، ۱۳۹۷، بررسی کارایی سنجه های شدت مختلف برای ارزیابی ظرفیت فروریزش قابهای خمشی فولادی دارای نامنظمی جرمی در ارتفاع، نهمین کنفرانس ملی سازه و فولاد، تهران، انجمن سازه های فولادی ایران.