Safety Analysis and Seismic Behavior of Concrete Arch Dams

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD. candidate, Department of civil engineering, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant professor, Department of civil engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Investigation of seismic behavior and seismic safety evaluation of concrete dams has been the focus of many researchers due to the importance of dam safety during an earthquake. Because the destruction of these structures due to an earthquake can have negative economic and social effects. In the present study, the nonlinear dynamic analysis of gravity concrete dams has been done considering the effect of dam-reservoir interaction. In fact, the minimum and maximum principal stresses for the U-shaped dam and reservoir have been measured via ANSYS. Also, the present study seeks to investigate the evaluation of V-shaped dams in seismic conditions. The results show that the static analysis with non-linear behavior in the rock mass with medium and weak layers has more stability compared to the weak homogeneous system. But it is more possible to concentrate plastic strains in weak layers. Other results of this study showed that the compressive stresses in the safety check of the dam were not critical and the maximum tensile arc stresses were obtained mainly in the upper levels of the middle blocks and also in the vicinity of the contact surface with the side supports.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1- Engineering guideline for the evaluation of hydropower projects-chapter 11: Arch dam design, 1999, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Division of dam safety inspection (FERC).
2- Earthquake engineering for concrete dams: Design, Performance and research needs, 1990, National Research Council (NRC).
3-EM-1110-2-1612: Ice Engineering, 1996, U.S. Army Corps of Engineering (USACE), Washington D.C.
4-Vibration of Hydraulic Equipment for Dams, 1996, International Commission on Large Dam (ICOLD), Bulletin 102, Paris, France.
5- EM-1110-2-2201: Arch Dam Design, 1994, U.S. Army Corps of Engineering (USACE), Washington D.C.
6- Design of Arch Dam, 1997, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), U.S. Department of Interior, Denver, CO.
7-Kupfer, H., and Gerstle, K. H., 1973, Behavior of concrete under biaxial stress, Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 99, 4, 853-866.
8- Zienkiewicz, O. C., and Taylor, R. L., 2000, The Finite Element Method-Volume I: The Basic, 5th Edition, Published by Butterworth-Heinemann.
9- Gravity Dams, (Design Standards No.2), 1966, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), U.S. Department of Interior, Denver, CO.
10- Alem bagheri, M., and Kazemi, M. Seyed., 1997, Numerical Modeling of Concrete Gravity Dams by ABAQUS.
11- Wang, Gaohui, et al., 2017, Deterministic 3D seismic damage analysis of Guandi concrete gravity dam: A case study, Engineering Structures, 148, 263-276.
12- Chopra, Anil K., and Chakrabarti, P., 1981, Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams including damwaterfoundation rock interaction, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 9, 4, 363-383.
13- Fenves, Gregory, and Chopra, Anil K., 1983, Effects of reservoir bottom absorption on earthquake response of concrete gravity dams, Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics 11, 6, 809-829.
14-Norouzi, F, Kalateh, F and Lotfollahi-Yaghin, M. A., 2017, Numerical Analysis of Dynamic Response of Concrete Gravity Dam under Blast Loading in the Reservoir, Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 47, 1, 91-104.
15- Souri, A., and Mirzabozorg, H., 2021, Investigating Effects of Stress-Dependent Material Damping on The Nonlinear Seismic Response of a Typical Concrete Gravity Dam, Sharif Journal of Civil Engineering, 36, 2, 119-130.
16- Pasbani Khiavi, M, Ghorbani, M, and Ghaed Rahmati, A., 2022, Investigation of the Effect of Near and Far Fault Earthquake on Seismic Response of Controlled Concrete Gravity Dams with Rubber Damper, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 9, 2, 215-229.
17- Westergaard, H. M., 2003, Water pressures on dam during earthquakes, Transactions ASCE, 98, 418-433.
18- EM 1110-2-6051: Time-History Dynamic Analysis of Concrete Hydraulic Structures, 1983, U.S. Army Corps of Engineering (USACE), Washington D.C.
19-Chopra, A. K., 1988, Earthquake response analysis of concrete dams, Advanced Dam Engineering for Design: Construction and Rehabilitation, Von Nostrand Reinhold.
20- Hariri Ardebili, M. A., and Mirzabozorg, H., 2010, Crack detection in seismic analysis of concrete arch dams using Endurance Time method, accepted to 9th International congress on advances in civil engineering, Trabzon, Turkey.
21- Emamjome, H., and Estekanchi, H. E., 2007, Estimation of incremental dynamic analysis results using Endurance Time method, 5th international congress in seismology and earthquake engineering, Tehran, Iran.